tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post6901753827667009682..comments2024-02-11T19:28:27.997+11:00Comments on Personal Reflections: The importance of carbon sequestration in soilsJim Belshawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10075614280789984767noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post-5770955655894898052011-04-23T06:24:56.692+10:002011-04-23T06:24:56.692+10:00Good morning KVD. No, your comment didn't drag...Good morning KVD. No, your comment didn't drag me away from a new direction, just amplified. As you know, I often do updates on posts. To my mind, it's part of the discussion/evolution process. This morning's post will be an example, generated by a comment on another blog.Jim Belshawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10075614280789984767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post-73627445259143951022011-04-23T06:16:57.124+10:002011-04-23T06:16:57.124+10:00Good morning Jim
The spam thing only interests me...Good morning Jim<br /><br />The spam thing only interests me because I like to know how "computer stuff" works; I am not worried by the treatment at all.<br /><br />I guess the only minor concern is that your own train of thought may have moved onto a different subject, and my comment might then be dragging you back to something of only passing interest.<br /><br />kvdAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post-44810112228917924712011-04-23T05:48:41.282+10:002011-04-23T05:48:41.282+10:00I don't know it is, KVD, about you and the spa...I don't know it is, KVD, about you and the spam system. I apologise; I was slow this time in picking up the problem. <br /><br />You have picked up a very good point. I will bring it up in the main text.Jim Belshawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10075614280789984767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post-11699556457527558512011-04-22T19:06:38.922+10:002011-04-22T19:06:38.922+10:00And I'm thinking of changing my name to spamal...And I'm thinking of changing my name to spamalot.<br /><br />kvdAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24338064.post-17461222129275253372011-04-22T18:43:25.633+10:002011-04-22T18:43:25.633+10:00Hi Jim
Cut/pastes from your essay:
CSIRO:
Most c...Hi Jim<br /><br />Cut/pastes from your essay:<br /><br />CSIRO:<br />Most current practices for sampling and analysis may be00 relatively expensive, but new and emerging techniques may reduce this cost over time.<br /><br />Sanderman & Baldoch:<br />there is time to develop more robust accounting systems that correctly credit agricultural management activities<br /><br />Liddicoat, Schapel, Davenport, Dwyer:<br />This highlights that an audit of existing capacity, and potential to improve capacity in South Australian soils is a key piece of work needed<br /><br />Now perhaps it’s just me, but there seems to be a pattern in the above comments.<br /><br />And then there’s your “it would still seem sensible to devote resources to exploring possibilities” – with which I absolutely agree. But I’m assuming you are talking about improved sequestration techniques, not the accounting therefore?<br /><br />kvdAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com